Legal Opinion
Marron v. H. O. Penn MacHinery Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 16, 1981No. Civ. A. B-75-356, B-76-346PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON POST-TRIAL MOTIONS
ZAMPANO, District Judge.
These consolidated cases 1 were commenced by the plaintiff, William Marrón, to recover damages for injuries he sustained when a forklift truck operated by a fellow employee backed over his ankle during the course of his employment at Bridgeport Rolling Mills (“Brimco”). Named as defendants were Caterpillar Tractor Company (“Caterpillar”), 2 the manufacturer of the forklift, and H. O. Penn Machinery Company, Inc. (“H. O. Penn”), 3 a distributor of Caterpillar products which leased the forklift to Brimco.
Brimco intervened as co-plaintiff in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fisser v. International BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Zaist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Airtex Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. Shelley Radiant Ceiling Company, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Rental Storage & Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lawson State Community College v. First Continental Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Svege v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004