Legal Opinion

Svege v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 22, 2004No. 3:01CV1771(MRK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

KRAVITZ, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court is the motion of defendant Mercedes-Benz Credit Corporation (“MBCC”) for summary judgment [doc. # 90] on the three remaining causes of action directed against it, counts two, four, and six of plaintiffs Amended Complaint [doc. # 35], all of which assert claims under the Connecticut Product Liability Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. §§ 52-572m et seq. (“CPLA”). 1

The issue on the present motion is whether MBCC is a “product seller” within the contemplation of Conn. Gen.Stat. § 52-572m(a) with respect to its ownership and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Burkert v. Petrol Plus of Naugatuck, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bourke v. Man Engines & Components, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
  2. Delgadillo v. Unitrons Consolidated, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Mancinone v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API