Legal Opinion

Watson v. Borah

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 6, 1913No. 2698PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from District Court, Wagoner Countyj Charles Bagg, Judge. Action by Aurelia Watson against W. A. Borah and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

Plaintiff, Aurelia Watson, sued the defendants, W. A. Borah, C. W. Walcott, I. B. Lumpkin, R. B. ICelly, Lee Collier, and George Jackson, seeking the cancellation of three certain deeds of conveyance and a lease, as follows: Deed from plaintiff to defendant Borah; from defendant Borah to defendant Walcott; from defendant Walcott to de fendant Lumpkin; and lease from defendant Lumpkin to defendant Kelly. The suit was dismissed by the’ plaintiff as to the defendant Collier, and the defendant Jackson filed an answer disclaiming an interest in the subject-matter of the action.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Apache State Bank v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Wat-Tah-Noh-Zhe v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Richardson, Roberts, Bryne Dry Goods Co. v. HockadaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Ritchie v. MulvaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. City of Chickasha v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Carter v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API