Legal Opinion

State v. McCarthy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 10, 2013No. 43308-7-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFearing, J.

¶1 Ryan Joseph McCarthy appeals the trial court’s sentence imposing, as part of restitution, the burial and funeral costs of victims shot by his accomplice in crime. He argues that the State was required but failed to show a causal relationship between these costs and the crimes for which he was convicted. Because RCW 9.94A-.753(7) requires that the trial court order a convicted defendant to pay, as restitution, costs paid by the crime victims’ compensation fund under the name of the defendant, and the trial court need not, under such circumstances, independently find a causal relationship…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Eric Raul Hernandez-navarroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. State Of Washington v. Micah A. HerreraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. State Of Washington v. Michael William BienhoffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. State Of Washington, V. Montreal Leanthony Morgan, Sr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API