Legal Opinion
In re Paul Kulig (Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Appellant)
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 15, 2022No. 21-AP-230PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: JUD.Reporter@vermont.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press.
2022 VT 33
No. 21-AP-230 In re Paul Kulig Original Jurisdiction (Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Appellant) Professional Responsibility Board March Term, 2022 Hearing Panel No. 8…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against GillinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BehnkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- In Re GildeaOregon Supreme Court · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re C. Robert Manby, Jr., Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023
- In Re Melvin Fink, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2022