Legal Opinion

Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Gillingham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1995No. 5154PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, C. J.

— Attorney Paul Gillingham appeals to this court from an order of the Disciplinary Board of the Washington State Bar Association (Board) suspending him from practice for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC). Gillingham concedes violations in that he obtained a loan from a client without meeting the proper safeguards and drafted a will in which he was named as a beneficiary. However, both bar counsel and the Board agree Gillingham repaid the loan with interest and did not receive any proceeds from the will.

A complaint was brought against Gillingham by the attorney for the personal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Estate of ShaughnessyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. LanzaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. In Re HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against PooleWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AnschellWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McMullenWashington Supreme Court · 1995

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API