Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Clark v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1995No. 94-118PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

“[A] physician conducting a medical examination, where the claimant seeks temporary total disability benefits, should, in most cases, possess some knowledge of the physical requirements associated with the former position of employment[.] [W]e deem it unnecessary for the physician to trace, in detail, every physical movement necessitated during the average workday.” State ex rel. Braswell v. Indus. Comm. (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 61, 63, 25 OBR 83, 85-86, 494 N.E.2d 1147, 1149-1150.

*380In vacating the commission’s order, the appellate court ruled that Dr. Dobrowski’s report did not satisfy Braswell.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Braswell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyd v. School Emps. Retirement Sys. Bd., 06ap-933 (7-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Rms of Ohio, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (3-28-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Clark v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Clark v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Timmerman Truss v. Indus. Comm. of Ohio, Unpublished Decision (8-26-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API