Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Braswell v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1986No. 85-317PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
On numerous occasions this court has stated that only where there is no evidence of record upon which the Industrial Commission could have based its factual conclusions concerning the grant or denial of workers’ compensation benefits will an abuse of discretion exist justifying the issuance of the extraordinary writ of mandamus. State, ex rel. Kramer, v. Indus. Comm. (1979), 59 Ohio St. 2d 39, 42 [13 O.O.3d 30]; State, ex rel. Paragon, v. Indus. Comm. (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 72 74; State, ex rel. Thompson, v. Fenix & Scisson, Inc. (1985), 19 Ohio St. 3d 76, 77.
In the syllabus of State, ex rel.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Paragon v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State ex rel. Kramer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. Thompson v. Fenix & Scisson, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Clark v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Boyd v. School Emps. Retirement Sys. Bd., 06ap-933 (7-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Rms of Ohio, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (3-28-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State ex rel. Clark v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995