Vermont Marble Co. v. Spafford
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Eaton; Smith, J. Bill by the Vermont Marble Company against Charles D. Spafltord and others for an accounting and for the appointment of a receiver. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The following statement of facts was prepared in the main by counsel for appellant; but it is borne out by the record: The complainant is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Vermont. For several years previous to the 7th day of November, 1905, George W. Loomis and Richard Venn were copartners and engaged in business; the firm name being Loomis & Venn. In November Mr. Loomis died. At the time of his death the firm was indebted to various people, and .owed the complainant $896.56, which still remains unpaid.
The surviving partner, Richard Venn, did not wind up the partnership…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Malone v. MaloneMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quinn v. Quinn Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918