Legal Opinion
In re Oppenheimer Rochester Funds Group Securities Litigation
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 16, 2015No. Master Docket No. 09-md-02063-JLK-KMT; MDL Docket No. 2063PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*438ORDER GRANTING LEAD PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND APPOINTMENT OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AND CLASS COUNSEL
Kane, SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
This multidistrict securities fraud class action is the last of seven such actions brought against OppenheimerFunds, Inc., by investors in various Oppenheimer Rochester-style municipal bond funds. Six of the seven consolidated class actions settled after omnibus motions to dismiss class actions claims were denied and have been dismissed with prejudice. The California Municipal Bond class action did not settle, and is before me now on remand…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.