Legal Opinion

Palivoda v. Sluberski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 29, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment and order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motions of Merry L. Butler, a/k/a Merry L. Hedges, and Danella Rental Systems, Inc. (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. Defendants submitted evidence in admissible form establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). In response, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. There is no objective medical basis for the opinions of plaintiff’s *1037experts that the injury shown…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dimenshteyn v. CarusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. McKnight v. La-ValleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Calderon v. ElsenreichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mastrantuono v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Markiewicz v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. Tedesco v. NowakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API