Legal Opinion

McKnight v. La-Valle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1989PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion granted. Memorandum: To be entitled to maintain an action under the Comprehensive Motor Vehicle Insurance Reparations Act, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she has sustained a serious injury, defined in section 5102 (d) of the Insurance Law as follows: " 'Serious injury’ means a personal injury which results in death; dismemberment; significant disfigurement; a fracture; loss of a fetus; permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function or system; permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Dwyer v. TraceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Zoldas v. Louise Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Lowe v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Lowe v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Phillips v. CostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. DeAngelo v. Fidel Corp. Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Atamian v. MintzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Stowell v. SafeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Van De Bogart v. VanderpoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API