Legal Opinion
Dimenshteyn v. Caruso
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1999PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated May 29, 1998, as granted the motion by the plaintiff Basya Dimenshteyn for reargument, and upon reargument, vacated so much of its earlier order dated February 13, 1997, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by Basya Dimenshteyn, and denied that branch of the motion.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Flanagan v. HoegAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Marshall v. AlbanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Waaland v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by22 opinions
- Nemchyonok v. Peng Liu YingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Mahoney v. ZerilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Villalta v. SchechterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Nozine v. Sav-On Car RentalsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Grant v. FofanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.