Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Carlson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1995No. 94-32PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, District Judge.

Appellant appeals from an Order Denying Motion for Netv Trial, and an Order Aivard-ing Costs and Receivership Fees. He argues that the trial court committed reversible error by communicating with the jury, and that it abused its discretion in the way it awarded costs and receivership fees.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant identified the issues as follows:

1. Whether it was error for the Court to fail to further instruct the jury in open court and on the record in violation of W.S. § 1 — 11—205(a)(vii) and W.S. § 1-11-209.

*2122. Was it an abuse of discretion for the trial court to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Armstrong v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. General Motors Corporation v. Dorethea M. Walden, the Surviving Spouse of Homer L. Walden, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Seeley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wallop v. WallopWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Heywood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Jensen v. Fremont Motors Cody, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API