Legal Opinion

Sykes v. United Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1950No. Appeal, 161PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

In this assumpsit action by the wife-beneficiary upon a life insurance policy issued to her husband, the trial judge directed a verdict for. defendant and the court en banc refused plaintiff’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial.

The policy, dated May 21, 1948, provided for quarterly premiums of $31.47. The second- premium, due August 21, 1948, was not paid until after the' grace period of 31 days had expired. On September 26, 1948, the husband was admitted to a hospital, suffering from miliary tuberculosis, and tubercular meningitis. Pour days after his admission,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. White v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Iwankow v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Malchinsky v. Mutual Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Gross v. Home Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Fishman v. Eureka-Maryland Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. West v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Gilda M. Fisher v. American National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
  3. Reed v. Donegal Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Clearfield County1988
  4. West v. Lincoln BenefitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API