In re Powers
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Mary P. Gorman, Chief Judge.
The Chapter 13 Trustee has filed motions to modify the confirmed plans in each of these cases. The Trustee claims that the debtors in each case have had increases in their incomes since their plans were confirmed and, accordingly, their plans should be modified to provide increased payments to unsecured creditors. Because the Trustee has failed to meet his burden of proof and failed to establish that he is entitled to the relief requested, both motions will be denied.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Because the same legal issues were raised in each of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- John H. Germeraad v. Myrick J. PowersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- In re MatusakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Pamela Therese MillerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 2020