Legal Opinion

In re Matusak

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided May 17, 2017No. CASE NO. 14-02032-5-SWHPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DIRECTED VERDICT

Stephani W. Humrickhouse, United States Bankruptcy Judge

This matter came on to be heard upon the motion of Maureen Brown (Brown) to modify the chapter 13 plan of the debtor, Thomas Edward Matusak, pursuant to § 1329 of the Bankruptcy Code. A hearing was held on January 19, 2017, in Raleigh, North Carolina. At the conclusion of the hearing, counsel for the debtor made an oral motion for directed verdict based upon the alleged insufficiency of Brown’s evidence as presented. After argument on the request for directed verdict was made, the court invited…

2Cases cited12 opinions

In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
In Re Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold, Debtor. Francis A. Arnold, A/K/A Frank Arnold v. Ruth WeastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
Barbosa v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
Lowery v. StovallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
Meza v. Truman (In Re Meza)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Duane Douglas CroniserUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023