Legal Opinion

In Re Application of Bonley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1942No. 33,300PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 6 N.W.2d 245. Action to register title to land acquired by Knute and Sophie Bonley by virtue of foreclosure of a tax lien. A.P. and Dorothea Rickmire, the original title owners, were made defendants in the action. They interposed a joint answer, which was stricken by the court for failure to comply with Minn. St. 1941, § 284.10 (Mason St. 1940 Supp. § 2190-4). The court made findings as though there were a default, and judgment was entered accordingly. Motion for amended findings or a new trial was denied. Thereafter, defendants moved "for a definite order allowing the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Storage Battery Co. v. HawleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  2. Bonley v. RickmireSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. KOTTKES'BUS COMPANY v. HippieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Spicer v. Carefree Vacations, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Jefferson v. SauersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Nyberg v. Cambridge State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API