Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nyberg v. Cambridge State Bank

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 1955No. 36,501Published

1DissentThomas Gallagher, Justice

Rule 41.02 of Rules of Civil Procedure, which supersedes M. S. A. 1949, § 546.39,7 provides:

“For failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with * * * any order of the court, a defendant may move for dismissal of an action * * * against him. * * * Unless the court * * * otherwise specifies, a dismissal under this rule * * * operates as an adjudication upon the merits.”

The object of the rules of civil procedure as stated in Rule 1 thereof is to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of any action, and Rule 41.02 is designed to facilitate the accomplishment of this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jeppesen v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Duenow v. LindemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Love v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Wisdom v. Texas Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API