Legal Opinion

Cundall v. U.S. Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2009No. 2008-0314Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Cundall v. U.S. Bank, 122 Ohio St.3d 188,

2009-Ohio-2523.] CUNDALL, TRUSTEE, APPELLEE, v. U.S. BANK, TRUSTEE; CAUDILL, EXR., ET AL., APPELLANTS; CUNDALL ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Cundall v. U.S. Bank, 122 Ohio St.3d 188,

2009-Ohio-2523.] Trusts — Trustees — Action alleging fraud, self-dealing, and other breaches of fiduciary duty by trustees in sale of stock — Four-year limitations period in R.C. 2305.09 applies — Limitations period begins to run when alleged breaches should have been discovered by complainants — Action time- barred. (No. 2008-0314 — Submitted January 14, 2009 —…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API