Legal Opinion

Indiana Department of Human Services v. Firth

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1992No. 49A02-9109-CV-413.1PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Judge.

This appeal requires us to interpret certain sections of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. 2 Respondent-appellant Indiana Department of Human Services (the Department) appeals the trial court’s ruling which reinstated an award to petitioner-appellee Andrew Firth. The Department raises two issues for our review, but our decision requires us to address but one, restated as

I. Whether Firth is eligible for the Department’s services.

We affirm, but remand to the Department for a determination of which services Firth should receive.

FACTS

Andrew Firth is a 25 year old profoundly deaf…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Koske v. Townsend Engineering Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. E. E. Black, Ltd. v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
  3. Park 100 Development Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Superior Construction Co. v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Daniel De La Torres v. William F. Bolger, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Casey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Huff v. BIOMET, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Indiana Waste Systems of Indiana, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1994
  5. Valadez v. R.T. Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API