Legal Opinion

American Economy Insurance v. Lyford

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 22, 1999No. 41035-1-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, C. J.

— American Economy Insurance Company appeals the trial court’s summary judgment order—which declared that American Economy has a contractual obligation to provide underinsured motorist coverage (UIM) to its insured, Mark Lyford, for a September 22, 1994 accident—contending that Lyford is not entitled to UIM benefits because Lyford failed to give advance written notice to American Economy of a settlement agreement with a tortfeasor that released the tortfeasor from further liability. Lyford requests attorney fees and costs on appeal.

Because American Economy was already fully apprised of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Reynolds v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Reynolds v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Allstate Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Griffin v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. TrippWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. TrippWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Allstate Insurance v. HustonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API