Legal Opinion

Paul v. Key System

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1947No. Civ. 13351PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

Defendants Key System, a corporation, and Chester L. Flansburg appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages for personal injuries. The jury returned a verdict for $12,000. Defendants’ motion for a new trial was denied on condition plaintiff waive all over $9,500, which condition was complied with by plaintiff. The jury found for defendant Grover G. Tiger who takes no part in this appeal.

The points raised on appeal are (1) sufficiency of the evidence, (2) excessiveness of the verdict, (3) prejudicial misconduct on the part of plaintiff’s counsel, and (4) reversible error in the conduct of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Roedder v. LindsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Freeman v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
  2. George v. Double-D Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Marcus v. Palm Harbor Hospital, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Meloy v. Texas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Daggett v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API