Legal Opinion

Ortman v. Laidlaw Transit

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 20, 2002No. 98-06708; A108891Published

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that her injury was excluded from compensability under ORS 656.005(7)(b)(C), which bars compensation for injuries caused, in major part, by the worker’s consumption of alcohol. We review the Board’s order for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 183.482(7) and (8), and affirm.

The facts are undisputed. In August 1997, claimant was on summer lay-off as a school bus driver for employer. On the date of the injury, claimant had lunch with some friends during which time she drank…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Dietz v. RamudaOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. SAIF Corp. v. JanuaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Sherman v. Western Employers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API