Legal Opinion
Hubbard v. Planning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 23, 1963PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The issue before us is the timeliness of an appeal under § 8-28 of the General Statutes. That statute provided that “any person aggrieved by an official action of a planning commission may appeal therefrom within fifteen days of such official action.” The decision appealed from was the defendant’s denial of the plaintiffs’ application for approval of a final plan for a subdivision under General Statutes § 8-26. It is unlikely that the question here presented will arise again. The 1963 General Assembly amended §§ 8-26 and 8-28 of the General Statutes to require a planning commission to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lamberti v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Tuohey v. MartinjakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Carbone v. Zoning Board of Appeals of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Murphy v. Elms HotelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Daley v. Board of Police Commissioners of East HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Norwich Land Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Bridgeport Bowl-O-Rama, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Akin v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.