Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Snell

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1964No. File 10078, 10082PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.

Lee Etta Peterson was injured while riding in an automobile operated by defendant, Claudia Snell. In this ensuing action the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $24,000. Thereafter defendants' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted and plaintiff appeals. Defendants' conditional cross appeal seeking a review of all adverse rulings of the trial court in the event of a reversal has heretofore been dismissed upon motion of plaintiff.

This is another Guest Act case involving the application of SDC 44.0362 which provides:

"No person transported by the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Scotvold v. ScotvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Antonen v. SwansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Peters v. HoisingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Thuente v. Hart MotorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  5. Woodman v. Hemet Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ebert v. FORT PIERRE MOOSE LODGE 1813South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lukens v. ZavadilSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Jennings v. HodgesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Boyd v. AlguireSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Friedhoff v. EngbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API