Legal Opinion

Leek v. Wieand

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 7, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

7 N.J. Super. 501 (1950)

71 A.2d 911

J. RAYMOND LEEK, EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF HENRY D. WIEAND, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF,

v.

BESSIE M. WIEAND, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided March 7, 1950.

Mr. Samuel P. Hagerman for Franklin D. Wieand, III, one of the defendants.

Messrs. Kirkman, Mulligan & Harris, by Mr. Frank P. Mulligan, for plaintiff.

Messrs. Moore, Butler & McGee, by Mr. Albert A.F. McGee, for defendant Bessie M. Wieand.

Messrs. Endicott, Dowling & Endicott, by Mr. Allen B. Endicott, 3rd, for defendant Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company.

Mr…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mahr v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Amparo Mining Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
  3. Amparo Mining Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  4. Kempson v. KempsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  5. Elgart v. MintzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API