Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Geho

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1973No. Appeal, No. 1383PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

The question in this appeal is whether the entry of guilty pleas by codefendants in a joint trial with appellant requires the withdrawal of a juror, despite cautionary instructions by the trial judge.

Appellant, Girard Geho, and two other codefendants were indicted and brought to trial jointly on charges of burglary, larceny, receiving stolen goods and conspiracy. Each defendant was represented by separate counsel. During the course of the trial, two of the defendants changed their pleas to “guilty” in the presence of the jury. The jury was sequestered and the two…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. TonerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  3. United States v. Armando RestainoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Milton R. AronsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Commonwealth v. BoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. KrajciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. GehoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API