Legal Opinion
United States v. Armando Restaino
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 17, 1966No. 15680PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STALEY, Chief Judge.
Appellant and six others were indicted for illegally manufacturing distilled spirits. The five-count indictment included the usual allegations: possession and custody of distilling apparatus without registering it with the Secretary of the Treasury, 26 U.S.C. §§ 5179(a), 5601(a) (1); carrying on the business of a distiller without first having obtained a bond, 26 U.S.C. §§ 5173(a), 5601(a) (4); manufacture of distilled spirits on premises which have not been bonded, 26 U.S.C. §§ 5222(a) (1), 5601 (a) (7); removing, depositing and concealing distilled…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- United States v. TonerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- United States v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. KennyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Richard Dunn v. Everett I. Perrin, Jr., Laurence Black v. Edward CoxCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- United States v. James W. McCord Jr., A/K/A Edward J. Warren A/K/A Edward J. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. MaliszewskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.