Chodosh v. Samuel Schlesinger, Winber Realty Co.
Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J.
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, C. C. J.
The court wiil deny the motion of the plaintiff for the reasons hereinafter stated. The reasons for the ruling will apply not only to the motion made by plaintiff’s counsel, but also to defendants’ motion. As the court understands the pleadings in this case there was a bill of foreclosure of a mortgage that is mentioned in this proceeding. This bill was filed in the Court of Chancery of this state and resulted in the foreclosure of a mortgage dated April 29th, 1926, made by one Schlesinger to the plaintiff in this cause. The mortgage expired by its own terms on April 29th,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- LaCombe v. HeadleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Fisovitz v. Cordosco Construction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
- Buchanan & Smock Lumber Co. v. BrowerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. LowenthalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Keiler v. BunnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.