Legal Opinion

Keiler v. Bunn

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided June 8, 1915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On application for retaxation of costs, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

A bill to foreclose was filed in the above-stated cause, and the defendants in an endeavor to avoid the payment of further interest and costs, requested the clerk to tax complainants’ costs as on dismissal, which he did, and they then tendered the amount of principal, interest and costs, as taxed, to the complainants, but they rejected the tender upon the ground that the bill of costs did not include taxation o£ search fees; and they now .move to retax the bill.

Upon the foreclosure of a mortgage the complainant is, of course, entitled to recover his costs along with the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrington Co. v. ChopkeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  2. Government Security Co. v. NassoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Chodosh v. Samuel Schlesinger, Winber Realty Co.Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API