Legal Opinion

Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. Lowenthal

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 25, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jayne, S. C. 0.

A motion is made in behalf of the plaintiff for a rule striking out the answer filed by the defendant in this action. The criticism of the answer is that it is sham and frivolous. Succinctly stated, the plaintiff seeks in this action to recover from the defendant the alleged deficiency due upon the bond executed on December 31st, 1926; by Hyman Lowenthal, now deceased, and by Annie Lowenthal. The complaint alleges that the mortgage accompanying the bond was foreclosed before the institution of this action.

The defendant in her representative capacity as executrix under the will…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cranmer v. ColeAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1933
  2. Mahaffey v. EvensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  3. Walgreen Co. v. MooreNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Guarantee Trust Co. v. HoffmanAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1938
  2. Henderson v. WeberNew Jersey Circuit Court · 1942
  3. Chodosh v. Samuel Schlesinger, Winber Realty Co.Hudson County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API