Legal Opinion

Novak v. Tigani

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 17, 1954No. 1237, Civil Action, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

Olympic argues that the first cause of action should be dismissed for two reasons. First, it contends that it is an invalid attempt to substitute it as a party in place of Steeplechase. In Ingerman v. Bonder, 7 Terry 99, 77 A. 2d 591, it was held that a third-party plaintiff could not implead a third-party defendant upon the theory that the latter was alone liable to the original plaintiff and, thus, substitute an entirely new party in the proceeding. But this is not such a case. Third-party plaintiff here, while it denies liability to the original plaintiff, nevertheless, brings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Atlantic Bldg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  2. Ingerman v. BonderSuperior Court of Delaware · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Novak v. TiganiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API