Legal Opinion

Novak v. Tigani

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 16, 1954No. 1237, Civil Action, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Herrmann, J.:

The plaintiffs brought this action for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligences of the defendants Francis W. Tigani (hereinafter called “Tigani”) and Delaware Steeplechase & Race Association (hereinafter called “Steeplechase”). The plaintiffs allege in their complaint that they were business invitees at the race track operated by Steeplechase and that they had left the track enclosure to enter the parking lot adjacent to the track; that the parking area was enclosed by a rope suspended from metal standards; that the rope was slack so that it was only two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sporia v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
  2. Goldsberry v. Frank Clendaniel, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1954
  3. Novak v. TiganiSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. NicholasDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1961
  2. Wolhar v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. Wallworks, Inc. v. Dougherty & Conrad Insurance ServicesSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API