Legal Opinion

Moore v. Camden & Trenton Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 4, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hendrickson, J.

This was an action of tort brought by a husband and wife for certain assaults and batteries alleged to *499have been inflicted upon the wife by the defendant railway company, its agents and servants - while engaged in erecting a trolley pole upon her land and premises at or near the corner of Grand and Beatty streets, in the city of Trenton. The trial judge directed a 'nonsuit as to the defendant railway company and another, and a verdict for the plaintiff was directed against the Mercer Construction Company, an independent contractor,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slingerland v. GillespieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Moore v. Camden & Trenton Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. PatrylowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Gindin v. BaronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Neigel v. Seaboard Finance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Clayton v. New Dreamland Roller Skating RinkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Claus v. BrodheadNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API