Legal Opinion
King v. Patrylow
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 28, 1951PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
15 N.J. Super. 429 (1951)
83 A.2d 639
THOMAS KING, AN INFANT, BY ROBERT KING, HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, AND ROBERT KING, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
MICHAEL PATRYLOW, HENRY PATRYLOW AND KATHERINE PATRYLOW, TRADING AS PATRYLOW'S GROVE & COCKTAIL BAR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND WALTER PATRYLOW, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 17, 1951.
Decided September 28, 1951.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. Alfred Brenner argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Charles Bressler, attorney).
Mr. Mark Townsend argued the cause for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Baines v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Staub v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Marzotto v. Gay Garment Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Holler v. P. Sanford Ross, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Faggioni v. WeissSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & BonelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Trecartin v. Mahony-Troast Construction Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- BELL ATLANTIC NETWORK SERVICES v. PM Video Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Mistretta v. AlessiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Guzzi v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.