Legal Opinion

St. Louis-SF Ry. Co. v. Van Hoy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 30, 1954No. 35694PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Parties are referred to herein as in the trial court.

Plaintiff sued defendant for damages resulting from an accident at an intersection of defendant’s railroad and a private road which crossed it. Plaintiff’s petition alleged negligence on the part of the railway engineer in failure to use ordinary care in stopping the train; it also alleged facts under which what is called the “last clear chance” or “humanitarian” doctrine might be applicable. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the lower court and defendant has appealed, arguing the alleged errors under 4 propositions.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Continental Gin Co. v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Gibson Oil Co. v. WestbrookeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Kelley v. McKaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jester v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. Chief Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API