Thalheimer v. Board of Supervisors
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
— Appellant, as a citizen and taxpayer of Maricopa county, brought this action to enjoin the board of supervisors of that county from ordering an election, upon a petition of voters duly filed, to determine whether the sale of intoxicating liquors within the county should be prohibited. From the judgment of the district court refusing the injunction, he brings this appeal.
The only question presented for our consideration is the validity of the “local option” legislation as embodied in title 43, Revised Statutes of 1901. That title provides that upon a petition being filed with the board of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Rippey v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- State v. Judge of the Circuit CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
- Caldwell v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District Number One v. La PradeArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Murray v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- McPherson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Ex parte ModeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Duffield v. AshurstArizona Supreme Court · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.