Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Buster

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1923No. 3476PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

Plaintiff in error owned ranches in Castro, Deaf Smith, and Terry Counties, upon which he employed more than three men. On the Castro County ranch there was a farm in connection. He had three employees there: defendant in error, who looked after the ranch work proper, and two others, who did the work primarily appertaining to the raising of and gathering the crops. For a full statement of the facts see Gordon v. Buster, 236 S.W., 803.

The single question here presented is whether or not a ranch laborer is exempted from the Workmen’s Compensation Law by Art. 5246-2 (V. C. T. S.) under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co. v. PastranaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. People ex rel. Rogers v. CaldwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gordon v. BusterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hill v. Georgia Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. CareyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Moulton v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Hight v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Holmes v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API