Gordon v. Buster
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson
Plaintiff in error owned ranches in Castro, Deaf Smith, and Terry Counties, upon which he employed more than three men. On the Castro County ranch there was a farm in connection. He had three employees there: defendant in error, who looked after the ranch work proper, and two others, who did the work primarily appertaining to the raising of and gathering the crops. For a full statement of the facts see Gordon v. Buster, 236 S.W., 803.
The single question here presented is whether or not a ranch laborer is exempted from the Workmen’s Compensation Law by Art. 5246-2 (V. C. T. S.) under the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1919
- C. C. Slaughter Cattle Co. v. PastranaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- People ex rel. Rogers v. CaldwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Gordon v. BusterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hill v. Georgia Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. CareyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Moulton v. Building InspectorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Hight v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Holmes v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.