Neil v. Neil
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 116, April T., 1904, by defendant, from order of C. P. Clarion Co., May T., 1903', No. 88, making absolute rule to open judgment in case of W. A. Neil to use of A. W. Corbett v. William A. Neil and J. H. Rifenberick. Rule to open judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morrison, J.,
This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Corbett, from the order of the court below opening a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff and against William A. Neil and J. Rifenberick on a judgment note. This note was dated February 11,1903, and *606was an ordinary promissory note with warrant authorizing any attorney to confess judgment, etc. The name of the payee was left out when the note was executed by Rifenberick, and afterwards Neil, the other defendant, inserted his own name as payee and signed the note above the name of Rifenberick.
It is conceded that Rifenberick and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Moore v. . Metropolitan National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Pennsylvania Railroad Company's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1878
- O'Connor v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Eldred v. Hazlett's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moore v. CroftIdaho Supreme Court · 1929