Legal Opinion

Moore v. Croft

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1929No. 5019PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRINCK, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate. The facts as they appear from the findings of the trial court are as follows: About February 15, 1921, pursuant to negotiations commenced on February 2, 1921, E. R. Dampier, as trustee for the stockholders and bondsmen of the Heyburn State Bank and for its benefit, borrowed $20,000 from plaintiff as trustee for four Boise banks, and as such trustee executed his notes therefor to the plaintiff. On or about February 3, 1921, the defendant William P. Croft, being the owner of certain lands, and for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Johnston Harvester Co v. McLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  3. J.R. Watkins Company v. KeeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Redfield v. WellsIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Phelps v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Brandt's EstateArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Moore v. CroftIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Phillips v. Clifford F. Reid, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API