Legal Opinion

Cardenas v. Mission Industries

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 9, 1991No. B047385PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ABBE, J. *

Mission Industries (Mission) appeals from the judgment after trial by court, awarding respondent, Jovita Cardenas (Cardenas), overtime pay, a waiting-time penalty, interest, and attorney’s fees. We affirm.

Facts

From January 7, 1987, through April 4, 1988, Cardenas was a live-in household employee of Linda Page Katzenstein McCaughey (Page).

Page was a major stockholder, chairman of the board and a vice-president of Mission. Shortly after Cardenas began work, she told Page that she needed health benefits. Page arranged for Cardenas to have health insurance through Mission’s group…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Collier & Wallis, Ltd. v. AstorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Hernandez v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. Rae-Venter Law GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Nordquist v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Evans v. PayeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Arias v. KardouliasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API