Legal Opinion

Staley v. Brown

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1962No. 42463PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

This suit is an effort hy a judgment creditor, Thomas F. Staley and others, a partnership, doing business as Reynolds and Company, appellants (called Reynolds), to hold a garnishee-bank, Deposit Guaranty Bank and Trust Company of Jackson, Mississippi, appellee (called Bank), liable for the amount of a judgment Reynolds has against Henry N. Brown, judgment debtor (appellee). One issue is whether the garnishor was confined to the account identified in the writ of garnishment, and we hold it was. A second issue is whether the uniform statute relating to notice to a bank of an adverse claim to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gendler v. Sibley State BankDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
  2. Phil Grossmayer Co. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  4. R. & M. Tire Service Co. v. Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Campbell v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Premier Financial Services. v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. First Bank of Whiting v. Samocki Bros. Trucking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Parkville Federal Savings Bank v. Maryland National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. Vaughn v. SpitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Carter v. State Mut. Federal Sav. & LoanMississippi Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API