Legal Opinion

Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.

This is a motion pursuant to section 51-a of the Civil Practice Act for an order permitting the defendant to give notice of the pendency of this action to Margaret Louisa Maitland-Tennent, an adverse claimant. The action is brought under the provisions of the English Exchange Control Act of 1947 (10 & 11 Geo. 6, ch. 14) to recover the credit balance in Mrs. Maitland-Tennent’s account with the defendant bank.

Section 51-a provides that, under circumstances such as are here presented, the court “ must ” grant the order (subd. 2), and “ must ”, as a condition thereof, impose upon the defend*383ant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koninklijke Lederfabriek " Oisterwijk " N. V. v. Chase National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Amstelbank, N. V. v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Leeds v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Koninklijke Lederfabriek " Oisterwijk " N. V. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Arizona Bank v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Staley v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API