Legal Opinion

L3Harris Technologies, Inc. v. Moog Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided February 24, 2025No. 6:24-cv-00602Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:24-cv-602-JSS-RMN MOOG INC., Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER Plaintiff, L3Harris Technologies, Inc., moves to dismiss the counterclaim (Dkt. 18 at 21–46) filed by Defendant, Moog Inc., for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Dkt. 20.) Defendant opposes the motion. (Dkt. 24.) For the reasons outlined below, the court denies the motion. BACKGROUND1 The parties work in the aerospace industry. (Dkt. 18 at…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Burger King Corp. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Maxcess, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. SFM Holdings Ltd. v. Banc of America Securities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API