Legal Opinion
Maxcess, Inc. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 27, 2005No. 05-10636PublishedCited by 244 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Maxcess, Inc. (“Maxcess”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its lawsuit against Defendants Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Lucent”) and Copper Mountain Networks, Inc. (“Copper Mountain”). After review and oral argument, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1998, Maxcess was formed for the purpose of providing local and long-distance telecommunications services via voice over internet. That same year, Lu-cent and Cooper Mountain developed PathStar, which according to Lucent was “a revolutionary new class of product designed specifically to enable network operators to offer low-cost,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Neal Horsley v. Gloria FeldtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- John J. Kassner & Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Green Leaf Nursery v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat. ComCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- SFM Holdings Ltd. v. Banc of America Securities, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Charles Johnson, Jr. v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Curtis Baker v. City of Madison, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. The Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.