Legal Opinion
Guttman v. Berry
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1948No. Civ. 16093PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants after trial before the court without a jury in an ejectment action.
The evidence being viewed in the light most favorable to defendants (respondents) these are the essential facts:
Several years prior to March 4, 1944, defendants were in possession of premises known as “346 and 346% North LaOienega, Los Angeles, California.” This property was then owned by Charles H. MacDonald. It consists of two stores located upon a lot approximately 135 feet deep which adjoins a 20-foot alley. After taking possession of the property defendants built on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Bellon v. Silver Gate Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Beckett v. City of Paris Dry Goods Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Fricke v. BradenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Scheimer v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- City of Santa Cruz v. MacGregorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Keck v. BrookfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Gilman v. NemetzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.