Brown v. Stoerkel
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This is an action of assumpsit.
The declai’ation contained three special counts, but the trial was had upon the third count alone, which alleged, in substance, that the defendants had convei’ted and appropriated to their own use moneys belonging to Local Assembly No, 8,104 of the Knights of Labor, which was an unincorpoz-ated association, and that the members of said local assembly had assigned their right, title, and interest in said moneys over to plaintiff. The jury, in the Wayne circuit court, returned a general verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of 8355.50, but, in response to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hyde v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Burt v. LathropMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Ebbinghousen v. Worth ClubNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1878
- Hyde v. WoodsDistrict Court, D. California · 1874
- Butterfield v. BeardsleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sergeant v. Goldsmith Dry Goods Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1920
- St. Paul Typothetæ v. St. Paul Bookbinders' Union No. 37Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- L. D. Willcutt & Sons Co. v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Venus Lodge No. 62 v. Acme Benevolent Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- County Assessor v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local No. 329Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.