Legal Opinion

United States v. Scott Tisdale (90-3302), Jerry L. Irby (90-3306), and James E. Fullilove (90-3335)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1992No. 90-3302, 90-3306 and 90-3335PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by three defendants from sentences imposed on pleas of guilty to various federal narcotics charges. Each of the defendants contends, among other things, that the district court erred in enhancing his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 for the possession of a firearm during the commission of the offense. One defendant also maintains that he was deprived of a Sixth Amendment right to be represented by counsel during presentence interviews with a probation officer.

With respect to the firearm enhancement question, we find that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. Harry Jarmar GordonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. David LeontiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Roeur Van v. Kurt Jones, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. United States v. Ronald DupreeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API