Legal Opinion
Roeur Van v. Kurt Jones, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 16, 2007No. 04-2277PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoggs, C.J.
COOK, J., (p.316), delivered a separate concurring opinion. MOORE, J. (pp. 316-18), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
BOGGS, Chief Judge.
Is a Michigan defendant’s consolidation hearing a critical stage of the criminal proceeding against him? And, if so, what results from his counsel’s total absence from that hearing? These questions are the nub of this case.
Roeur Van appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The court issued a Certificate of Appealability with respect to whether Van’s Sixth Amendment rights to counsel and a fair trial were…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Ramirez v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Henness v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Scott Schmidt v. Brian FosterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Robert BurstonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Steven Moss v. Gary MiniardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.